发布时间
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前源站更新
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前首次抓取
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前发布时间
12 分钟前源站更新
12 分钟前首次抓取
12 分钟前用于追踪这条内容的来源与记录标识。
Source
原始链接
发布时间
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前源站更新
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前首次抓取
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前发布时间
12 分钟前源站更新
12 分钟前首次抓取
12 分钟前用于追踪这条内容的来源与记录标识。
Source
原始链接
Review The Reinvention of Apollo Is Bigger Than Its Scandals William Cohan chronicles the private equity giant’s colorful past. But its push into the savings of the upper middle class makes its future more consequential.
发布时间
34 天前
2026-09-04 15:00:00 UTC
源站更新
34 天前
2026-09-04 15:00:00 UTC
首次抓取
34 天前
2026-09-04 21:11:43 UTC
这篇书评认为，阿波罗已从私募股权巨头转型为类似轻监管杠杆银行，通过 Athene 年金吸收中上阶层储蓄并放贷，其未来影响比莱昂·布莱克等人的丑闻更值得关注；但《烧钱》一书冗长散乱，未能深入探讨这一转型的关键问题。
William Cohan's book review argues Apollo now operates like a lightly regulated leveraged bank, using annuity sales to upper-middle-class savers to fund loans; this reinvention matters more than Leon Black's scandals, though the book is sprawling and unfocused.
用于追踪这条内容的来源与记录标识。
