发布时间
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前源站更新
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前首次抓取
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前发布时间
12 分钟前源站更新
12 分钟前首次抓取
12 分钟前用于追踪这条内容的来源与记录标识。
Source
原始链接
发布时间
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前源站更新
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前首次抓取
2026/03/25 04:5812 分钟前发布时间
12 分钟前源站更新
12 分钟前首次抓取
12 分钟前用于追踪这条内容的来源与记录标识。
Source
原始链接
BlueCrest’s Hedge Fund Traders Should Just Pay Their Taxes By Paul J. Davies, Columnist
发布时间
98 天前
2026-07-02 14:50:08 UTC
源站更新
98 天前
2026-07-02 14:50:08 UTC
首次抓取
98 天前
2026-07-02 22:47:01 UTC
英国最高法院裁定，对冲基金 BlueCrest 试图将数十名交易员伪装成合伙人以避税 2 亿英镑的做法不合法。裁决认定，这些交易员实质是雇员，应缴纳所得税。BlueCrest 抱怨英国不再是商业友好之地，但文章认为其应守法纳税。
The UK Supreme Court ruled against hedge fund BlueCrest, finding that its traders are employees, not partners, and must pay roughly £200 million in taxes. The court upheld rules designed to stop disguised salary in partnerships, rejecting the firm's claim that its traders'
用于追踪这条内容的来源与记录标识。
